MoneyBookers - moneybookers.com

[sindarin]

As the alternatives for Paypal you can use them, so far i don't see any problem with use them, the only problem maybe about the verification i heard a lot of strictness story about them that make me don't want to verify my account here yet, even i already used them for few transactions

 

[hadg33]

Yes,you are very correct,I think skrill has no issues with there services. I have also read about skrill in different forums that there verification is so strict. If the verification is so strict,I think so many people would not want to use there services. That is what I just feel.

 

[ryuken]

Well compared to the paypal they are not much strict in verification. Just the adddress verification will work for the account. that is how i have managed to use the moneybookers for my personal use there.

 

[Decub]

But I also learnt that the verification requires a hard copy kind of thing where the owner of the account would have the letter sent to the address he specified and in which case, there would be no verification if that isn't followed. That is just like going back to old ways of doing things.

 

[sindarin]

Yes,you are very correct,I think skrill has no issues with there services. I have also read about skrill in different forums that there verification is so strict. If the verification is so strict,I think so many people would not want to use there services. That is what I just feel.

People will think twice, but i think they are not strict, i think they are as overstrict, so far from my sufing about Skrill review, i only find many bad reviews like they banned someone without reason just like paypal in early times, but i just hope that as time goes on Skrill does not love to ban someone's account

 

[Decub]

That is one of the things so synonymous with some of the regulated payment processors. Just a suspect of irregularities will grant you a ban either proven or not. But I think most times, the ban comes to unverified account holders.

 

[sindarin]

That is one of the things so synonymous with some of the regulated payment processors. Just a suspect of irregularities will grant you a ban either proven or not. But I think most times, the ban comes to unverified account holders.

But there are also some cases where the owner of taht account even already got VIP account, i know about that because that is one of the fellow in my country which banned by them, but as usual it is a mixed review, because in the other hand other people still give some good review, while the other is not.

 

[Decub]

You mean given you a VIP tag after banning you or for some kind of trust they've got in you. Yes, there could be varying reasons why an account holder would be given some preferential title but it's rare to find among payment processors, more so, regulated ones.

 

[sindarin]

I mean that owner got their VIP member first and then get banned after some months hold that VIP account, i don't know the reason behind that thing, but for sure it will bring so many bad impression about MoneyBookers/Skrill and they need to worked up with those things

 

[Decub]

Oh! That's kinda weird and you know, I hear some strict stuffs being talked about MB on way you go during verification where the person has to receive a letter from them. Some kinda manual verification or something in this computer age and it makes me wonder if the recipient of the letter MUST be the account holder.

 

[sindarin]

Well compared to the paypal they are not much strict in verification. Just the adddress verification will work for the account. that is how i have managed to use the moneybookers for my personal use there.

It is easier for some poerson while the others said that is totally not good for them. Actually if we talk about this thing, it will be a subjective posts once again because each person have their own view, but it is better if you verify your account here, because you will have less problem with them, if you usually use them

 

[Decub]

Even by extension, most of the payment processors too. They seem to leverage their strictness on verified users. MB might just be overly strict to those unverified account holders but in a case where they gave someone who has already gotten a VIP tag a hot chase becomes very questionable.

 

[sindarin]

Oh! That's kinda weird and you know, I hear some strict stuffs being talked about MB on way you go during verification where the person has to receive a letter from them. Some kinda manual verification or something in this computer age and it makes me wonder if the recipient of the letter MUST be the account holder.

Because they want to make sure if that users is not the fake one so they using that way and proven effectively to fight against for someone who want to create a fake verification account, i think that is fine but for some people i think they wouldn't accept something like that

 

[Decub]

But is it not a postal authority or mail delivery agent that would deliver the mail and in such case when it is delivered, would they still authorize the recipient of the mail to show off his I.D as a criteria for receiving the mail. It's something that sounds complicated because if I want to make an account for someone else, I can still do the whole verification myself.

 

[sindarin]

That is make the way harder, so we can even prevent something like you said in the last paragraph, i think it will be really boring to do something like that over and over again, right? they don't meant to be bad for us but they are doing for the sake of anti-fraud act.

 

[anosocialnet]

This is business, this is people sweat, this is people hustling and so this is people money. Then in any form or ways this payment processor Admin try's to protect those funds, that is better. Either Manual or Automatic fine. But it has to be more easy for newbies usage, because many customers can leave alone what they can not comprehend, and that will affect their business in terms of traffic.

 

[willy]

i want to tell you something about this payment processor it is great because i have an account in this processor and it is not verified but i can receive 1000 eur each 3 months this is the limit of unverified accounts therefore it is great in my opinion

 

[sindarin]

i want to tell you something about this payment processor it is great because i have an account in this processor and it is not verified but i can receive 1000 eur each 3 months this is the limit of unverified accounts therefore it is great in my opinion

Here is the other positive review about Skrill, and i also to be honest still using them even my balance only 2 digits. Neverthless, from many sides i see that Skrill is useful especially to someone who prefer gambling and also who have online shops at the same time.

 

[anosocialnet]

Here is the other positive review about Skrill, and i also to be honest still using them even my balance only 2 digits. Neverthless, from many sides i see that Skrill is useful especially to someone who prefer gambling and also who have online shops at the same time.

Is like you have Omitted something for the other, When has MB turned into Skrill ... or has the both marge together or is it from the same company like Payza to Egopay. Please try letting me to know the right from the wrong one, so i should not try carry out Fack News every were thinking that i am smart.

 

[Decub]

@anosocialnet, Skrill is MB and vice versa. They were formerly known as moneybookers but it doesn't mean that if you access their webpage as mb you wouldn't land to the page.

Well, if they have such limit of €1000 for unverified users, then it's a fine one.